Field Value Correction Note |
1 |
|
10 |
St. Jacques | F. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 4 |
1863 |
38 |
On line 1,
the value for the surname
field is "St. Jacques",
the suggested correction is "St Jacques". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
10 |
St. Jacques | ???? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 14 |
1868 |
33 |
On line 2,
the value for the givens
field is "????",
the suggested correction is "Idas". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: Please see 1911.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
10 |
|
11 |
Dion | Vr.H.C. |
F |
|
Head |
W |
Jan 21 |
1846 |
55 |
On line 10,
the value for the givens
field is "Vr.H.C.",
the suggested correction is "H C, Vv". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
13 |
|
12 |
Jee | Fm C. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 28 |
1848 |
52 |
On line 13,
the value for the givens
field is "Fm C.",
the suggested correction is "Th?". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: Please see 1891.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
13 |
|
12 |
Jee | Fm C. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 28 |
1848 |
52 |
On line 13,
the value for the surname
field is "Jee",
the suggested correction is "Fee". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
16 |
|
12 |
Jee | Edsth |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 4 |
1880 |
20 |
On line 16,
the value for the givens
field is "Edsth",
the suggested correction is "Edith". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
13 |
Lamer | Sos |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 1 |
1871 |
30 |
On line 22,
the value for the givens
field is "Sos",
the suggested correction is "Jos". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: As per BMS2000.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
13 |
Lamer | Marie J.B.J |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 17 |
1901 |
1/12 |
On line 24,
the value for the givens
field is "Marie J.B.J",
the suggested correction is "Marie J B?". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
13 |
Hebert | Claren?? |
F |
|
Servant |
S |
Jul 24 |
1886 |
14 |
On line 25,
the value for the givens
field is "Claren??",
the suggested correction is "Clar?". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
27 |
|
14 |
Carreau | MarieL?? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 9 |
1865 |
36 |
On line 27,
the value for the givens
field is "MarieL??",
the suggested correction is "Marie Ls". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: It's Marie-Louise Lamothe, as per BMS2000.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
15 |
Ouellette | A??lphe |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 13 |
1881 |
9 |
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "A??lphe",
the suggested correction is "Adolphe". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
35 |
|
15 |
Brandner | Ed?lr??? |
F |
|
Servant |
S |
Jun 9 |
1883 |
17 |
On line 35,
the value for the givens
field is "Ed?lr???",
the suggested correction is "(?)". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
35 |
|
15 |
Brandner | Ed?lr??? |
F |
|
Servant |
S |
Jun 9 |
1883 |
17 |
On line 35,
the value for the surname
field is "Brandner",
the suggested correction is "Brand?". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
16 |
Boisseau | FXA |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 15 |
1852 |
48 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "FXA",
the suggested correction is "F X A". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
37 |
|
16 |
Boisseau | Ze??iri? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 10 |
1859 |
44 |
On line 37,
the value for the givens
field is "Ze??iri?",
the suggested correction is "Zephirine". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: Please see 1911.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
43 |
|
17 |
Brousseau | Le |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 7 |
1847 |
53 |
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "Le",
the suggested correction is "Ls". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
The following comment was attached: It's Louis as per BMS2000.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
18 |
Coté | Caroline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 28 |
1857 |
43 |
On line 46,
the value for the day
field is "28",
the suggested correction is "21". Submitted by Michel Dubois.
|
|