Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
20 |
Williams Guy |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 23 |
1877 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Williams Blake |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 21 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Williams Ewart |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 15 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Layfield George |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 17 |
1834 |
67
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Layfield Jane |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 20 |
1834 |
67
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
Forster Thomas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 15 |
1858 |
43
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
Forster Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 28 |
1878 |
22
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
Gray Frank |
M |
|
Head |
S |
May 15 |
1862 |
38
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
Gordon Robert |
M |
|
Head |
W |
Jan 29 |
1827 |
74
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams Stephen |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 15 |
1863 |
38
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams Issbella |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 17 |
1866 |
34
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams Fredick |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 27 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams Agnes |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 17 |
1893 |
8
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 22 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Williams Jane |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 8 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Robert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 28 |
1863 |
37
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Sarah |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 8 |
1870 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Edith |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 3 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Mildred |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 25 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Dora |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 8 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Lyness Ruth |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 9 |
1900 |
|
|
|
27 |
Thomson Peter |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 23 |
1833 |
67
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Thomson Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 20 |
1850 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Childs James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 29 |
1840 |
61
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Childs Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 24 |
1840 |
61
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Childs Nichols |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Sep 11 |
1838 |
63
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Wales George |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Feb 3 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Wilson James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 5 |
1856 |
44
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Wilson Margret |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 28 |
1881 |
19
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
McCaulley Cannie |
F |
|
Sister in Law |
S |
Nov 4 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Benoyst Alexander |
M |
|
Head |
W |
Dec 19 |
1824 |
76
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Ralph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Nov 1 |
1859 |
42
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Ann |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 22 |
1862 |
39
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 20 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Clinton |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 23 |
1884 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Ralph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 3 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Harry |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 29 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley May |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 11 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Frank |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 5 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Chamley Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 8 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
Hodder John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 13 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
01 |
|
33 |
Hodder Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 22 |
1852 |
48
|
|
|
01 |
|
33 |
Hodder Horatio |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 7 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
01 |
|
33 |
Hodder Robert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 21 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
01 |
|
33 |
Hodder Margaret |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 22 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
01 |
|
33 |
Hodder Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 22 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
01 |
|
34 |
Obyrne Daniel |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Aug 15 |
1869 |
31
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
Graham John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 3 |
1853 |
48
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
Graham Annie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 1 |
1875 |
26
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
Graham Alice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 8 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 1:
The following note applies to line 2:
The following note applies to line 3:
The following note applies to line 4:
The following note applies to line 5:
The following note applies to line 6:
The following note applies to line 7:
The following note applies to line 8:
The following note applies to line 9:
The following note applies to line 10:
The following note applies to line 11:
The following note applies to line 12:
The following note applies to line 13:
The following note applies to line 14:
The following note applies to line 15:
The following note applies to line 16:
The following note applies to line 17:
The following note applies to line 18:
The following note applies to line 19:
The following note applies to line 20:
The following note applies to line 21:
The following note applies to line 22:
The following note applies to line 23:
The following note applies to line 24:
The following note applies to line 25:
The following note applies to line 26:
The following note applies to line 27:
The following note applies to line 28:
The following note applies to line 29:
The following note applies to line 30:
The following note applies to line 31:
The following note applies to line 32:
The following note applies to line 33:
The following note applies to line 34:
The following note applies to line 35:
The following note applies to line 36:
The following note applies to line 37:
The following note applies to line 38:
The following note applies to line 39:
The following note applies to line 40:
The following note applies to line 41:
The following note applies to line 42:
The following note applies to line 43:
The following note applies to line 44:
The following note applies to line 45:
The following note applies to line 46:
The following note applies to line 47:
The following note applies to line 48:
The following note applies to line 49:
The following note applies to line 50:
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
11 |
|
25 |
Williams | Issbella |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 17 |
1866 |
34 |
On line 11,
the value for the givens
field is "Issbella",
the suggested correction is "Issbela". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
25 |
Williams | John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 22 |
1895 |
6 |
On line 14,
the value for the year
field is "1895",
the suggested correction is "1995". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: enumeration error
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
30 |
|
30 |
McCaulley | Cannie |
F |
|
Sister in Law |
S |
Nov 4 |
1888 |
12 |
On line 30,
the value for the givens
field is "Cannie",
the suggested correction is "Annie". Submitted by Cheryl Martyn.
The following comment was attached: the tail of the "g" -not a "C"
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: b-6
District: NEW WESTMINSTER
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com