Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
15 |
Searff? | Thomas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 11 |
1839 |
61 |
On line 2,
the value for the surname
field is "Searff?",
the suggested correction is "Searff(?)". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
The following comment was attached: Please use (?) for consistency throughout the census.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
3 |
|
15 |
Searff? | Isibela |
M |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 1 |
1841 |
55 |
On line 3,
the value for the year
field is "1841",
the suggested correction is "1846". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
The following comment was attached: The "6" is written over the line.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
7 |
|
15 |
Watson | Jas. |
M |
|
|
S |
|
1869 |
32 |
On line 7,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Hired man".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
7 |
|
15 |
Watson | Jas. |
M |
|
|
S |
|
1869 |
32 |
On line 7,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Hired man". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
7 |
|
15 |
Watson | Jas. |
M |
|
|
S |
|
1869 |
32 |
On line 7,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Hired man".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
17 |
McKinnon | Flora |
F |
|
Mother |
W |
Mar 10 |
1827 |
74 |
On line 12,
the value for the givens
field is "Flora",
the suggested correction is "M. Flora". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
19 |
Griedosa? | Thom |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Aug 19 |
1852 |
48 |
On line 19,
the value for the surname
field is "Griedosa?",
the suggested correction is "Griedosa(?)". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
The following comment was attached: Please use (?) for consistency throughout the census.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
30 |
|
20 |
Keith | Martha E. |
F |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 25 |
1877 |
23 |
On line 30,
the value for the relationship
field is "Son",
the suggested correction is "Sister". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
20 |
Keith | Cristine |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Dec 23 |
1880 |
20 |
On line 31,
the value for the age
field is "20",
the suggested correction is "21". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
The following comment was attached: The age is given as 21.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
20 |
Keith | William |
M |
|
Brother |
S |
Nov 16 |
1884 |
16 |
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "William",
the suggested correction is "William G.". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
20 |
Keith | Maggie |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Aug 2 |
1892 |
8 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "Maggie",
the suggested correction is "Maggie I". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
21 |
Ritchie | John S. |
M |
|
Sister |
S |
Oct 2 |
1900 |
5 mo |
On line 45,
the value for the lineNo
field is "45",
the suggested correction is "44".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
21 |
Ritchie | John S. |
M |
|
Sister |
S |
Oct 2 |
1900 |
5 mo |
On line 45,
the value for the relationship
field is "Sister",
the suggested correction is "Son".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
21 |
Ritchie | Nance? |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
May 24 |
1855 |
46 |
On line 45,
the value for the givens
field is "Nance?",
the suggested correction is "Jane". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
22 |
Williams | Greg |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Apr 26 |
1876 |
25 |
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "Greg",
the suggested correction is "Guy". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
22 |
Williams | Greg |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Apr 26 |
1876 |
25 |
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "Greg",
the suggested correction is "Guy". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
48 |
|
22 |
Wiliams | Robert |
M |
|
|
S |
Sep 16 |
1888 |
12 |
On line 48,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "nephew".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
49 |
|
22 |
Williams | Eliza |
F |
|
|
S |
Feb 6 |
1894 |
6 |
On line 49,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "niece".
|
|