Field Value Correction Note |
1 |
|
59 |
Sullivan | Tunotory |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Oct 22 |
1858 |
42 |
On line 1,
the value for the givens
field is "Tunotory",
the suggested correction is "Timothy". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Although quite faded, magnification shows the second last letter of Given is an "h". The 2 letters between "T" & "o" are "im" thus Given is: Timothy.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
3 |
|
59 |
Sullivan | Maria |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 28 |
1883 |
17 |
On line 3,
the value for the givens
field is "Maria",
the suggested correction is "Maud". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Only 4 letters entered by enumerator. First two are "Ma" 3rd= "u" 4th="d". It matches "d" in Head wherever entered on this page.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
9 |
|
60 |
Habey | William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 21 |
1865 |
35 |
On line 9,
the value for the surname
field is "Habey",
the suggested correction is "Halley". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: The tail of letter from line above gets in the way as it drops into the 2nd "l". Name is clearer on Daughter Rita's line 13.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
60 |
Bigzius | Rosetta |
F |
|
Niece |
S |
Jul 29 |
1880 |
21 |
On line 14,
the value for the surname
field is "Bigzius",
the suggested correction is "Biggins". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Letters are really fading out. Under higher magnification they are clearer.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
60 |
Bigzius | Rosetta |
F |
|
Niece |
S |
Jul 29 |
1880 |
21 |
On line 14,
the value for the year
field is "1880",
the suggested correction is "1889". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: Must be transcribed "as is, as in" original document. In this case enumerator entered 1889.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
60 |
Grea? | R? |
M |
|
B-I-L |
S |
Jan 16 |
1853 |
48 |
On line 15,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "B-I-L",
the suggested correction is "Brother-in-law". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
16 |
|
61 |
Langloys | Robert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep |
1872 |
28 |
On line 16,
the value for the surname
field is "Langloys",
the suggested correction is "Langloyes". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
The following comment was attached: As entered by enumerator, there is an "e" between the "y" & "s". Since he is French, correct spelling w/b Langlois. I believe both spellings have same Soundex.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
62 |
Windle | Marga???? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 22 |
1897 |
3 |
On line 22,
the value for the givens
field is "Marga????",
the suggested correction is "Margarite". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
62 |
E??rge | Margurite |
F |
|
M-I-L |
W |
Apr 18 |
1842 |
58 |
On line 25,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "M-I-L",
the suggested correction is "Mother-in-law". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
62 |
E??rge | Margurite |
F |
|
M-I-L |
W |
Apr 18 |
1842 |
58 |
On line 25,
the value for the surname
field is "E??rge",
the suggested correction is "Bergin". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
62 |
E??rge | James |
M |
|
B-I-L |
S |
May 20 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "E??rge",
the suggested correction is "Bergin". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
62 |
E??rge | James |
M |
|
B-I-L |
S |
May 20 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 26,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "B-I-L",
the suggested correction is "Brother-in-law". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
32 |
|
63 |
Frayer | Louis |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 25 |
1893 |
7 |
On line 32,
the value for the day
field is "25",
the suggested correction is "21". Submitted by Aileen Sloane.
|
|